[j-nsp] Need suggestions..

[TCIS List Acct]

No, we are not spaced constrained.

I forgot to mention we are looking to spend as little money as possible, and are 
OK with older gear :-)  We've got 4 M7i's at the edge in production now and 
could probably buy a few more to use for this, but the # of Gig-E interfaces in 
the M7i might constrain us eventually (will not be a throughput constraint at all).

Maybe a M10i or even some of the J-series might work?  These devices will be 
gateway devices for our distribution switches and not sit at the edge of the 
network.  They just need to be able to hold at least a full routing table (when 
I said 4 full tables before, that was the # of upstreams we take routes from, 
but I know we have only ~300K or so routes actually active in the router)

Nathan Sipes wrote:
> Would depend on the physical interface options that you need the MX80 
> might be a fit. Is the enviroment space constrained?
> 
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:07 AM, TCIS List Acct 
> <listacct at tulsaconnect.com <mailto:listacct at tulsaconnect.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi folks,
> 
>     I need a device that:
> 
>     - Can handle 4 full routing tables
>     - Has full layer 3 capability, including OSPF/BGP
>     - Has at least 4 Gigabit Ethernet ports
>     - Can handle switch-like functions like VLANs/trunking
>     - Has redundant A/C power supplies
> 
>     Suggestions welcome.
> 
>     TIA.
> 
>     --Mike
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>     <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 

-- 

-----------------------------------------
Mike Bacher / listacct at tulsaconnect.com
TCIS - TulsaConnect Internet Services
http://www.tulsaconnect.com
-----------------------------------------