[j-nsp] Need suggestions..

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday 04 February 2010 04:46:52 pm Pekka Savola wrote:

> FWIW, OP may have meant 4 full tables in RIB+FIB, 4 in
>  RIB and 1 in FIB, or something else.  I thought the
>  second.  A more recent RE could do the trick, but it's a
>  different issue if that's the most sensible approach in
>  the grand scheme of things..

Concerns about the RE-850 abound. 

With the way JUNOS + the Internet routing table are growing, 
I'm worried.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100204/6a092154/attachment-0001.bin>