[j-nsp] MX-Series JUNOS Version

Mark Tinka mtinka at globaltransit.net
Thu Feb 4 13:18:24 EST 2010


On Friday 05 February 2010 01:42:29 am Eric Van Tol wrote:

> Hi all,
> We just took shipment of some MX960s and MX240s for a
>  much needed network upgrade.  They came shipped with
>  10.0R2.10.  This seems to be the latest and greatest
>  version of JUNOS.  The question is, is anyone currently
>  running it and is it "stable"?  Any serious bugs I
>  should be aware of that might not be listed in the JTAC
>  site?

We generally try to stay away from anything pre-R3 or R4 
(depending on the history of R1 and R2). I haven't had a 
chance to try JUNOS 9.6 or 10.0, but this is mostly 
influenced by how terrible 9.x has been, and we're done 
"chasing" JUNOS.

Too bad 9.5R4 has been seriously delayed.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100205/5cf0adaf/attachment.bin>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list