[j-nsp] Juniper Policy based VPN
George
gmburu at cellulant.com
Tue Feb 16 07:08:22 EST 2010
How about get sa cmd
All my other working tunnels are in A/U except this one in A/U and I/U
as shown below. Why would be my outgoing SA be Inactive, due to this I
cannot tunnel traffic to the specific host.
0000008d< 192.168.8.8 500 esp:a256/md5 35153af8 3533 unlim A/U 159
0
0000008d> 192.168.8.8 500 esp:a256/md5 ea070377 3533 unlim I/U 160
0
0000008f< 192.168.8.8 500 esp:a256/md5 35153af9 3543 unlim A/U 161
0
0000008f> 192.168.8.8 500 esp:a256/md5 3e0376fe 3543 unlim I/U 162
0
Regards
George
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 17:20 +0000, Humair Ali wrote:
> Proxy id is just a value created by the source/destination and service
>
> what do you see in the event logs, what does the other end see ?
>
> post the logs related to the vpn in here
>
>
> On 15 February 2010 16:16, George <gmburu at cellulant.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Ali
>
> I got no output in get ike cookie cmd for the remote peer,
> below is the output of get sa (with IP replace).
>
> 0000008c< 192.168.8.8 500 esp:a256/md5 00000000 expir unlim
> I/I 163 0
> 0000008c> 192.168.8.8 500 esp:a256/md5 00000000 expir unlim
> I/I 164 0
>
> I was reading this
> http://forums.juniper.net/t5/Firewalls/Strange-behaviour-on-proxy-id-in-relation-to-policy-based-VPN-s/td-p/17227;jsessionid=D03859B6C630C41327CB0AE8063DC5E5
>
> there is something about multiple IP's in the destination,
> what is proxyID about specifically.
>
> Regards
> George
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:03 +0000, Humair Ali wrote:
>
> > Hi George
> >
> > well First thing first,
> >
> > if it was working and all of sudden it became intermittent,
> > then what has changed in your network ?
> >
> > Does the remote end changed anything in terms of set up ?
> >
> > when you try to re-establish , you say it is not passing
> > through the VPN , what do you see in your events logs ?
> >
> > if you do get ike cookie and get SA , what do you see ?
> >
> > Only route based vpn is bind to a Tunnel IF, policy basaed
> > vpn is bind, well, to a policy with action "tunnel" (in the
> > policy)
> >
> >
> > On 15 February 2010 12:52, George <gmburu at cellulant.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > We had a Juniper policy based VPN which was
> > initially working, all of a
> > sudden it became intermittent and we decided to
> > re-do it. Now after
> > redoing it, it refused to come up even as of now.
> > How do i sort it, and can a policy based VPN be
> > binded to a tunnel. For
> > the policy im using the Mapped IP to tunnel the
> > traffic to the remote
> > host bust incidentally it is not passing through the
> > VPN when I do a
> > trace.
> >
> > Regards
> > - ----
> > George Mburu N.
> > Networks and Infrastructure
> > Cellulant Group
> >
> > Life, is mobile....
> > - ----
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list