[j-nsp] EOMPLS between 10G subinterface and GE subinterface between two 7600 with Juniper MX480 as CE1
Ioan Branet
ioan.branet at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 11:44:40 EST 2010
Hello group,
I have the following setup
CE1(Juniper MX480) xe3/1/0.999 -----Te7/3.999 PE1(Cisco 7600)----PE2(Cisco
7600)Gi2/2.999---SVI 999(7600)CE2
I configured EOMPLS between PE1 and PE2 and if I use Cisco 7600 as CE1 I am
able to ping between CE1 and CE2
If I use MX480 Juniper I cant ping between CE1 and CE2.
Here is my config:
CE1:
show configuration interfaces xe-3/1/0
description "** Link To PE1-Te7/3-EOMPLS **";
vlan-tagging;
link-mode full-duplex;
gigether-options {
no-auto-negotiation;
}
unit 999 {
bandwidth 10g;
vlan-id 999;
family inet {
accounting {
source-class-usage {
input;
}
}
no-redirects;
sampling {
input;
}
address 150.1.1.2/30 {
primary;
preferred;
}
}
}
PE1:
sh running-config interface te7/3
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 139 bytes
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet7/3
description Link to CE1 - xe-3/1/0 for EoMPLS
mtu 9216
no ip address
load-interval 30
end
sh running-config interface te7/3.999
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 116 bytes
!
interface TenGigabitEthernet7/3.999
encapsulation dot1Q 999
xconnect 2.2.2.2 9999 encapsulation mpls
end
int lop0
ip add 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
PE2:
interface GigabitEthernet2/2
description Link to CE2 for EoMPLS
mtu 9216
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet2/2.999
description EOMPLS_TEST
encapsulation dot1Q 999
xconnect 1.1.1.1 9999 encapsulation mpls
end
int loop0
ip add 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
CE2:
sh running-config interface gi2/2
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 633 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet2/2
description Link to PE2
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 999
switchport mode trunk
interface Vlan999
ip address 150.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
end
I have the EOMPLS circuit up but I cant ping between Juniper CE1 and Cisco
CE2
sh mpls l2transport vc 9999 detail
Local interface: Gi2/2.999 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 999 up
MPLS VC type is Eth VLAN, interworking type is Ethernet
Destination address: 1.1.1.1, VC ID: 9999, VC status: up
Output interface: Vl894, imposed label stack {2419 5896}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: active
Next hop: x.x.x.x
Create time: 00:00:06, last status change time: 00:00:06
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 1.1.1.1:0 up
Targeted Hello: x.x.x.x(LDP Id) -> y.y.y.y
MPLS VC labels: local 1684, remote 5896
Group ID: local 0, remote 0
MTU: local 9216, remote 9216
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
VC statistics:
packet totals: receive 0, send 0
byte totals: receive 0, send 0
packet drops: receive 0, send 0
PE1
#show mpls l2transport vc 9999 detail
Local interface: Te7/3.999 up, line protocol up, Eth VLAN 999 up
MPLS VC type is Eth VLAN, interworking type is Ethernet
Destination address: 2.2.2.2, VC ID: 9999, VC status: up
Output interface: Te4/3, imposed label stack {5673 1692}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: active
Next hop: x.x.x.x
Create time: 00:00:06, last status change time: 00:00:06
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 2.2.2.2:0 up
Targeted Hello: x.x.x.x(LDP Id) -> y.y.y.y
MPLS VC labels: local 2083, remote 1692
Group ID: local 0, remote 0
MTU: local 9216, remote 9216
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
VC statistics:
packet totals: receive 2, send 0
byte totals: receive 128, send 0
packet drops: receive 0, send 0
It seems that i send arp-reply from Juniper and the Juniper is learning arp
from CE2:
show arp no-resolve | match xe-3/1/0
00:16:9c:6d:42:80 150.1.1.1 xe-3/1/0.999 none
Juniper PCAP Flags [Ext, In], PCAP Extension(s) total length 22
Device Media Type Extension TLV #3, length 1, value: Ethernet (1)
Logical Interface Encapsulation Extension TLV #6, length 1, value:
Ethernet (14)
Device Interface Index Extension TLV #1, length 2, value: 193
Logical Interface Index Extension TLV #4, length 4, value: 126
Logical Unit Number Extension TLV #5, length 4, value: 32767
-----original packet-----
0:16:9c:6d:42:80 > Broadcast, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100), length 64:
vlan 999, p 0, ethertype ARP, arp who-has 150.1.1.2 tell 150.1.1.1
11:34:01.878596 Out
Juniper PCAP Flags [Ext], PCAP Extension(s) total length 22
Device Media Type Extension TLV #3, length 1, value: Ethernet (1)
Logical Interface Encapsulation Extension TLV #6, length 1, value:
Ethernet (14)
Device Interface Index Extension TLV #1, length 2, value: 193
Logical Interface Index Extension TLV #4, length 4, value: 126
Logical Unit Number Extension TLV #5, length 4, value: 32767
-----original packet-----
0:21:59:a7:c4:30 > 0:16:9c:6d:42:80, ethertype 802.1Q (0x8100),
length 46: vlan 999, p 0, ethertype ARP, arp reply 150.1.1.2 is-at
0:21:59:a7:c4:30.
If i replace the Juniper with a 7600 evrything looks ok.
I tried to use alsa a GE interface for EOMPLS between CE1 and PE1 instead of
10G interface and it works also:
show configuration interfaces ge-1/1/1
description "**Link to ro-PE1-ForEoMPLS**";
vlan-tagging;
link-mode full-duplex;
gigether-options {
no-auto-negotiation;
unit 564 {
description "** EOMPLS **";
vlan-id 564;
family inet {
accounting {
source-class-usage {
output;
}
destination-class-usage;
}
address 150.1.1.1/30;
sh running-config interface Gi9/12.564
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 208 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet9/12.564
description EOMPLS CE1
encapsulation dot1Q 564
xconnect 2.2.2.2 9999 encapsulation mpls
end
Any feedback is appreciated.
Thank you,
Regards,
John
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list