[j-nsp] Routing between routing instance

[Stefan Fouant]

It's easy to put a default route inside a routing-instance:

set routing-instance InstanceA routing-options static route x.x.x.x/x
next-hop y.y.y.y

However, if the next-hop points to an interface which is not bound to the
InstanceA routing-instance you the route is not going to become active.
This is typically why you would configure a rib-group and configure your
interface-routes to be mirrored in the routing-instance and inet.0.  Or if
the interface is bound to inet.0 then you could simply create a default
route inside the InstanceA routing-instance and point it to a next-table of
inet.0.

Can you give us more specifics to what you are trying to accomplish?

Stefan Fouant, CISSP, JNCIE-M/T
www.shortestpathfirst.net
GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D

> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of SunnyDay
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 7:19 AM
> To: Juniper-Nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] Routing between routing instance
> 
> Hello i have configured  a routing instance as  vrf type.And configured
> this:
> 
> 
> interface-routes {
>     rib-group inet InstanceA;
> 
> rib-groups {
>     InstanceA {
>         import-rib [ InstanceA.inet.0 inet.0 ];
> 
> Which caused all the interface routes to be imported to the  Routing
> instance routing table and then configured this :
> 
> route 10.0.0.0/24 next-table InstanceA.inet.0;
> 
> To be able to ping inside the vrf from the default routing instance.
> My question is how can i put inside InstanceA just a default route and
> not the interfaces routes?
> Thank you
> 
> 
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4789 (20100120) __________
> 
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp