[j-nsp] IPv6

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday 25 January 2010 11:34:21 am Richard A Steenbergen 
wrote:

> That would be Brokeade (suppose I have to switch to
>  calling it vendor B now), Farce10 doesn't even earn a
>  spot in my L3 vendor disqualification process. They seem
>  to suck a bit less at L2, but then again who doesn't.

The first time they visited us back in '07, we threw them 
out on account of lack of deep Layer 3 and MPLS support. Not 
sure how far they've come since then... honestly, life is 
hard enough as it is with what we already have. But what do 
I know :-)...

> Did you ever try ISIS when they first added it back in
>  7.6 ironware or so? I once got it to use negative
>  metrics, despite having wide-only configured. :)

Apart from the fact that our sister-company's data centre 
hosts a major national exchange point based on Brocade's MLX 
system, I haven't logged any hours with this platform 
outside of some recent labs.

But the "negative metrics" thing sounds pretty exciting :-).

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100125/40adcd42/attachment.bin>