[j-nsp] J series users bitten by the massive memory useincrease with flow mode add, please file jtac cases.

[Jay Hanke]

After implementing the procedure did you see a drop in memory utilization?
If so, how much?

jay

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Ryce
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 7:51 AM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J series users bitten by the massive memory useincrease
with flow mode add, please file jtac cases.

On the back of this I have a j6350 running 10.0R3.10 and am using for some
bgp and ospf.

Is the best guide to following to move from flow to packet-based this
http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Enabling_packet_based_forwarding or
does anyone have any other suggestions?

Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heath Jones
Sent: 21 July 2010 11:51
To: Chris Evans
Cc: juniper-nsp at punk.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] J series users bitten by the massive memory useincrease
with flow mode add, please file jtac cases.

Chris I have to agree with you there. Its even worse on the 'partner' side
of things.. You customers get informed more than we do (let alone listened
to)!!

To be fair though, a lot of vendors are like this nowadays.
If anyone is interested in forming a vendor that cares about (and
communicates with!) the small and medium sized customers, and builds quality
products that aren't only tested once they hit the production network - I'm
in!





On 21 July 2010 11:35, Chris Evans <chrisccnpspam2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just a thought.  If this bothers you guys so much, start looking at
> other vendors.  The only way to get juniper motivated to fix things is
> to hurt them financially as they don't seem to care what their
> existing customers want imho.
>
>  On Jul 21, 2010 6:25 AM, "Leigh Porter"
> <leigh.porter at ukbroadband.com>
> wrote:
>
> Just install Linux on the box ;-)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heath Jones
> Sent: 21 July 2010 11:05
> To: C...
>
>  Just a quick thought... what about renaming the flowd binary..?
>
> No I haven't tested it :)
>
>
> On 20 J...
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

--

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Any
offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification.
Errors and omissions excepted.  Please note that any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Lumison.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses.  Lumison accept no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp