[j-nsp] J series users bitten by the massive memory useincrease with flow mode add, please file jtac cases.

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, July 22, 2010 05:12:08 pm Pavel Lunin wrote:

> But imho running things like full BGP,

Yes.

> tons of IFLs with
> queues,

Skip that.

> thousands of IGP routes,

Yes.

> label forwarding
> states,

Skip that.

> etc

Maybe

> on J series is a little bit strange sort of
> network design :) Upto 1Gbps performance (has anyone
> tested how 300k prefixes in FIB affect forwarding
> performance of J?) and things like this — you really
> need it?

Route reflector.

> If you believe you really need this, why not to
> stay at old good 9.3 packet-based JUNOS?

Because it won't have some of the features only available in 
later code, which - wait for it - is ES-only.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100723/b593ae9d/attachment.bin>