[j-nsp] J series users bitten by the massive memory use increase with flow mode add, please file jtac cases.

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, July 22, 2010 07:00:45 pm Pavel Lunin wrote:

> The problem with EX in ISP applications is very limited
> MPLS capabilities. So if you want VPLS or L3VPN in some
> remote location, EX will not save you although it has
> way higher forwarding performance.

Yes, this, indeed, was a problem. But I'm sure Juniper also 
saw that if they shipped a half-decent MPLS code base in the 
1U EX-series platform, it'd be a commercial disaster for 
them.

For this, I can appreciate. Problem is, the MX80 is too 
large and too expensive as a true "MPLS in the Access" box. 
This, in my opinion, is where I think Juniper dropped the 
ball; and Cisco's new ME3600X/ME3800X is right on cue to 
sweep this market.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100723/3f46eac0/attachment.bin>