[j-nsp] JUNOS and MX Trio cards

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday 29 June 2010 04:05:55 pm Richard A Steenbergen 
wrote:

> So far things aren't looking good.

Very, very nasty, indeed. Hope you have JTAC running around 
on this. Would be glad to hear what comes of it. Nasty, 
indeed.

On my end, while away on tour, Juniper came back and took 
back a test MX80 and got it reinstalled with a more stable 
version of JUNOS 10.2. The previous one was causing regular 
Gig-E SFP modules to output a rather weak laser, and the 
remote devices didn't have any clue that there was anything 
the other side (850nm, no less).

The box came back with a newer JUNOS and fixed laser power. 
Yet to follow-up with details, but it's odd.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100629/e31b8931/attachment-0001.bin>