[j-nsp] EX4200 upgrade

Dan Farrell danno at appliedi.net
Sun Mar 7 02:06:19 EST 2010


We use 10.0S1.1 in a heavy production environment (750+ RVI's across 21 downstream switches in a two-stack VC chassis setup) with no issues. <knocking on wood>

10.1.R.18 is nice, but had nothing we needed in our environment to upgrade to.

I would compare 10.0.R2 release notes (what 10.0S1.1 fixed) with 10.1R1.8 before making a decision. It almost sounds like by the previous reply that Juniper feels safer with the S release over the latest R release.


That all being said, I thought 10.1R.18 was just 10.0S1.1 with a couple more features (that we didn't need, so we didn't upgrade twice in a week). Am I wrong here?


Dan
danno at appliedi.net

________________________________________
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michel de Nostredame [d.nostra at gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 3:15 PM
To: Alexey Kholmov
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 upgrade

Hi Alexev,

Current version for EX4200 is 10.1R1.8, but per Juniper that 10.0S1.1
is recommended.

see
   https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/software/junos_software_versions.jsp
for more details.

Regards,
--
Michel~




On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Alexey Kholmov
<alexei at twine-networks.com> wrote:
> Hi juniper-nsp,
>
> I need to upgrade EX4200.
>
> Please advise which version of JUNOS should I use?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> Regards,
> Alexey Kholmov
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list