[j-nsp] Trunking on SRX

Quoc Hoang quochoang at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 15 15:56:07 EDT 2010


Thanks for the feedback.

With vlan routing interfaces (vri), anyone using it in different virtual routers and zones.

quoc

--- On Mon, 3/15/10, matthew zeier <mzeier at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: matthew zeier <mzeier at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Trunking on SRX
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Date: Monday, March 15, 2010, 10:28 AM
> This is exactly what we're doing at
> Mozilla on 10.1R1.8.  Boxes have been up since 10.1R1.8
> was loaded 21 days ago:
> 
> mrz at phx-fw1> show system uptime 
> node0:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Current time: 2010-03-15 17:27:33 UTC
> System booted: 2010-02-22 05:57:50 UTC (3w0d 11:29 ago)
> Protocols started: 2010-02-22 05:58:59 UTC (3w0d 11:28
> ago)
> Last configured: 2010-03-11 00:29:07 UTC (4d 16:58 ago) by
> dmoore
>  5:27PM  up 21 days, 11:30, 1 user, load averages:
> 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
> 
> node1:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Current time: 2010-03-15 17:27:33 UTC
> System booted: 2010-02-22 06:25:30 UTC (3w0d 11:02 ago)
> Last configured: 2010-03-11 00:29:05 UTC (4d 16:58 ago) by
> dmoore
>  5:27PM  up 21 days, 11:02, 0 users, load averages:
> 0.06, 0.03, 0.00
> 
> > 
> >> Hi,
> >>  Looking to trunk (vlan tagging) on the SRX
> 3600 to reduce the number of physical interfaces required.
> Anyone currently using it that can provide feedback or
> issues? Good or bad idea?
> >> 
> >> Doesn't appear to be any details of vlan tagging
> in the srx docs so not sure if it's officially supported.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list