[j-nsp] RPD event M20

Juniper juniper at iber-x.com
Tue May 4 11:54:17 EDT 2010


Hello,

I've just executed this comand on the shell and it appeared a lot of routes:

root at eg01% rtsockmon -t rpd
         sender   flag    type       op
[17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6 2401:ee00:: tid=2 
plen=32 type=user flags=0x10 nh=indr nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262144 filtidx=0
[17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6 
2401:ee00:1c1c::2001:668 tid=0 plen=32 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst 
nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
[17:30:29] rpd      P    route      change  inet6 
2401:ee00:1c1c::2001:668 tid=2 plen=32 type=user flags=0x10 nh=indr 
nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262151 filtidx=0
[17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6 
2400:6800:1c1c::2001:668 tid=0 plen=32 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst 
nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
[17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6 
2400:6800:1c1c::2001:668 tid=2 plen=32 type=user flags=0x10 nh=indr 
nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262151 filtidx=0
[17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6 2404:8000:f:0:1c1c:: 
tid=0 plen=48 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
[17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6 2404:8000:5:0:1c1c:: 
tid=0 plen=48 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
[17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6 2404:8000:c:0:1c1c:: 
tid=0 plen=48 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
[...]
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 195.140.208.0 tid=0 
plen=22 type=user flags=0x0 nh=indr nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262147 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 85.197.112.0 tid=0 
plen=20 type=user flags=0x0 nh=indr nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262147 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 195.225.208.0 tid=0 
plen=22 type=user flags=0x0 nh=indr nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262147 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 195.158.54.0 tid=0 
plen=24 type=user flags=0x0 nh=indr nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262147 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 195.158.54.0 tid=2 
plen=24 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=573 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 85.197.112.0 tid=2 
plen=20 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=573 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 195.140.208.0 tid=2 
plen=22 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=573 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 195.225.208.0 tid=2 
plen=22 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=573 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 148.247.205.0 tid=2 
plen=24 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=583 filtidx=0
[17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 148.247.22.0 tid=2 
plen=24 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=583 filtidx=0
[..]

The output is very long ( I had to stopped after 3 minutes) and we don't 
know if that is normal o no. What should we do? Is it possible to clean 
this routes?

Thanks a lot for your help,

Matthew


El 04/05/2010 15:14, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim escribió:
> you can check for persistent routing updates i.e. flaps by running 
> rtsockmon -t rpd on the shell.
>
> On 4 May 2010 22:04, Juniper <juniper at iber-x.com 
> <mailto:juniper at iber-x.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello there,
>
>     This message has appeared in the log of our M20. It is not the
>     first time it occurs and we are quite worried. The average CPU
>     consumption is 4% and just at the time the message appeared on the
>     log, we found increases up to 100% and an increase in temperature
>     of 6 º in the routing-engine 0. This router works with two logical
>     routers and receive full-routing of three different providers. We
>     also have configured and IS-IS  and IBGP sessions.
>
>     May 4 11:43:03 xxx01.yyy2.abc-d.net <http://xxx01.yyy2.abc-d.net>
>     LEV[2625]: RPD_SCHED_SLIP: 7 sec scheduler slip, user: 3 sec
>     306043 usec, system: 0 sec, 5732 usec
>
>     We do not know what could be the problem because we have not
>     detected any event bgp, routing update, addition of new machines, etc.
>     Do you have any idea what may be the reason for this high cpu usage?
>
>     Thanks in advance,
>
>     Matthew
>     _______________________________________________
>     juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>     <mailto:juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Thank you for your time,
> Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list