[j-nsp] MX240
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Wed May 12 04:28:54 EDT 2010
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 03:58:40 am Keith wrote:
> Yea, but would you like two ASR1002s over one MX240? :)
Depends on the situation.
If I need only one edge router, the MX240 will be better.
If I'm peering and I need no more than a couple of Gbps per
router from multiple partners in a PoP, I can spread my risk
across two routers. That helps me sleep at night :-).
It really all depends on the application.
> MX80 is a suggestion. Be interesting to see what the
> sales guys can do for us on price for two MX80 instead
> of one 240.
Let us know how that goes.
Cheers,
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100512/01b36269/attachment.bin>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list