[j-nsp] MX240

Mark Tinka mtinka at globaltransit.net
Fri May 14 12:50:13 EDT 2010


On Friday 14 May 2010 04:29:34 pm William Jackson wrote:

> I guess one of the big differences for choosing MX240
>  over MX80 would be the Dual RE capability on the MX240.
> I have been told by our SE that the MX80 will be able to
>  be clustered like the SRX style cluster in the future.

For some applications, RE redundancy would not be as 
critical as having physically separate boxes, particularly 
if that second RE will cost you.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100515/f74edb04/attachment.bin>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list