[j-nsp] IBGP in RR

[Mark Tinka]

On Sunday 16 May 2010 02:45:18 am David water wrote:

> In case of redundant RR, how the IBGP session will be
>  build between RR: under cluster  configuration or under
>  IBGP group configuration? Both RR is part of same
>  cluster. In any way the clients will have IBGP session
>  to both RR and RR will ignore the routes received from
>  each other because of cluster-id.

Typically, iBGP sessions between route reflectors would be 
implemented outside the cluster. However, IIRC, JUNOS 
doesn't necessarily require this, and normal loop prevention 
mechanisms supported by the CLUSTER_LIST attribute still 
apply even if the route reflectors were configured as 
clients of one another (something I'd normally not do, 
anyway).

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20100516/ccb0445f/attachment.bin>