[j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering - IPv6

Paul Stewart paul at paulstewart.org
Tue Nov 2 16:44:53 EDT 2010


Found it .. sorry folks - there was a document on their site that explained limitations on 10.2 and IPv6 clustered WAS listed there as not implemented.  Now I find new information at 

http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/releases/10-2/#security

IPv6
Release 10.2 adds several new IPv6 capabilities to SRX and J Series devices, including support for:

    * Address books and address set entries that contain any combination of IPv4 addresses, IPv6 addresses, and Domain Name System (DNS) names
    * Chassis clusters in active-passive (failover) deployments
    * Using IPv6 DiffServ code points in class of service (CoS) classifier rules and re-write rules
    * Flow-based processing, which enables SRX and J Series security features to process IPv6 traffic
    * The ability to configure a logical interface with an IPv4 address, and IPv6 address or both

Any feedback on those folks who have deployed it and have it working is appreciated.... customer is a bit concerned about cost - I'm just concerned about it actually working properly ;)

Cheers,

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 4:39 PM
To: 'Crist Clark'; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering - IPv6

Hmmm.. interesting - I thought I had reviewed 10.2 for this support... will dig deeper.  So then comes the question - anyone actually *using* IPv6 on clustered SRX?  Any real-world feedback?

I have an SRX210H at home and recently discovered an annoying "bug" that IPv6 isn't supported on VLAN interfaces... that was kind of a shock to be blunt..

Thanks,
Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: Crist Clark [mailto:Crist.Clark at globalstar.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:22 PM
To: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering - IPv6

I just happened to be looking at the 10.2 release notes after
seeing your email.

  "IPv6 Support
    [snip]

    * Chassis cluster—In JUNOS Release 10.2, we support chassis
cluster in an active-passive (failover) deployment. [Junos OS Security
Configuration Guide]"

You may want to have a closer look at the 10.2 documentation
(the current recommended release for SRXs). I am not using
this feature so I have no personal experience whether it actually
works.


On 11/2/2010 at 10:43 AM, "Paul Stewart" <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:
> Hi there.
> 
>  
> 
> We are looking to bring on an additional SRX650 at a site by
clustering.
> One of the requirements though is IPv6 traffic and it appears it's
not
> supported?
> 
>  
> 
> From
>
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-c

> ollections/release-notes/10/topic-39007.html :
> 
>  
> 
> Chassis Cluster
> 
> On SRX Series and J Series devices, the following features are not
supported
> when chassis clustering is enabled on the device:
> 
> *	All packet-based protocols, such as MPLS, Connectionless
Network
> Service (CLNS), and IP version 6 (IPv6)
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Do any of the SRX boxes support clustering with IPv6?  Is there any
timeline
> on this being fixed that anyone knows of?
> 
>  
> 
> Our goal is redundant routing engines should something happen - makes
more
> $$$ sense to add an additional SRX650 when there is one existing..
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
>  
> 
> Paul
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp 


-- 

Crist Clark
Network Security Specialist, Information Systems
Globalstar
408 933 4387



_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list