[j-nsp] RSTP over logical-system.
David Lockuan
dlockuan at gmail.com
Tue Nov 2 22:08:22 EDT 2010
Hi guys,
I'm testing the protocols rstp over logical-systems, but when I set the
priority over one interface for it work as root, it is not change the status
in the protocols rstp and the other interface don't change to Blocking.
theirs always keep on Forwarding state.
The topology that I am using it is the next:
SW1 (logical)-----------ge-3/0/2------------loop
fisico------------ge-3/0/3----------SW2(logical)
SW1 (logical)-----------ge-3/0/4------------loop
fisico------------ge-3/0/5----------SW2(logical)
I want to put the interface ge-3/0/2 as root interface.
These are configuration of both logical-systems:
*******************************************************************************
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0> show configuration interfaces
ge-3/0/2 {
encapsulation ethernet-bridge;
}
ge-3/0/3 {
encapsulation ethernet-bridge;
}
ge-3/0/4 {
encapsulation ethernet-bridge;
}
ge-3/0/5 {
encapsulation ethernet-bridge;
}
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0> show configuration logical-systems SW1
interfaces {
ge-3/0/2 {
unit 0 {
family bridge;
}
}
ge-3/0/4 {
unit 0 {
family bridge;
}
}
}
routing-instances {
11 {
instance-type virtual-switch;
protocols {
rstp {
bridge-priority 0;
interface ge-3/0/2 {
priority 0;
mode point-to-point;
}
interface ge-3/0/4 {
mode point-to-point;
}
force-version stp;
}
}
bridge-domains {
br1 {
interface ge-3/0/2.0;
interface ge-3/0/4.0;
}
}
}
}
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0> show configuration logical-systems SW2
interfaces {
ge-3/0/3 {
unit 0 {
family bridge;
}
}
ge-3/0/5 {
unit 0 {
family bridge;
}
}
}
routing-instances {
12 {
instance-type virtual-switch;
protocols {
rstp {
bridge-priority 8k;
interface ge-3/0/3 {
mode point-to-point;
}
interface ge-3/0/5 {
mode point-to-point;
}
force-version stp;
}
}
bridge-domains {
br1 {
interface ge-3/0/3.0;
interface ge-3/0/5.0;
}
}
}
}
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0>
*******************************************************************************
The output of the show spanning-tree commands:
*******************************************************************************
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0> ...e interface logical-system SW1 routing-instance 11
Spanning tree interface parameters for instance 0
Interface Port ID Designated Designated Port State
Role
port ID bridge ID Cost
ge-3/0/2 0:123 0:123 0.80711f8c7fd0 20000 FWD
DESG
ge-3/0/4 128:125 128:125 0.80711f8c7fd0 20000 FWD
DESG
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0> ...e interface logical-system SW2 routing-instance 12
Spanning tree interface parameters for instance 0
Interface Port ID Designated Designated Port State
Role
port ID bridge ID Cost
ge-3/0/3 128:124 128:124 8192.80711f8c7fd0 20000 FWD
DESG
ge-3/0/5 128:126 128:126 8192.80711f8c7fd0 20000 FWD
DESG
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0> show spanning-tree bridge logical-system SW1
Spanning-tree is not enabled in layer2-control instance SW1/default.
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0> ...ge logical-system SW1 routing-instance 11
STP bridge parameters
Routing instance name : SW1/11
Context ID : 1
Enabled protocol : STP
Root ID : 0.80:71:1f:8c:7f:d0
Hello time : 2 seconds
Maximum age : 20 seconds
Forward delay : 15 seconds
Message age : 0
Number of topology changes : 2
Time since last topology change : 388 seconds
Local parameters
Bridge ID : 0.80:71:1f:8c:7f:d0
Extended system ID : 0
{master}
nsn at MX960-LAB-RE0> ...tree bridge logical-system SW2 routing-instance 12
STP bridge parameters
Routing instance name : SW2/12
Context ID : 2
Enabled protocol : STP
Root ID : 8192.80:71:1f:8c:7f:d0
Hello time : 2 seconds
Maximum age : 20 seconds
Forward delay : 15 seconds
Message age : 0
Number of topology changes : 1
Time since last topology change : 396 seconds
Local parameters
Bridge ID : 8192.80:71:1f:8c:7f:d0
Extended system ID : 0
*******************************************************************************
I don't know, if my configuration is right? or maybe i have a mistake.
Somebody has tried to implement this feature on single chassis MX with
logical-systems??
Thanks in advance for your help.
--
David
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list