[j-nsp] 10.3 on MX960 with MPC only?

[Chris Evans]

On another note.. Has anyone tested the inline services of the Trio chipset?
Meaning GRE, IP-IP, JFlow, etc.. ??

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Derick Winkworth <dwinkworth at att.net>wrote:

> You know, just as this thread popped up on this list, we were dealing with
> a
> multicast related issue...  On an MX if you statically map a unicast IP
> address
> to a multicast mac address, you have to specify a single l2 interface to
> forward
> that traffic out of.  It essentially defeats the whole purpose of creating
> the
> mapping in the first place.
>
> So I thought, what if we connect to ports on the same box together?  This
> worked.  Essentially you create a logical interface on one end of the cable
> and
> you move your layer 3 config to it for that particular VLAN, then the other
> end
> of the cable is just a trunk port.
>
>
> This might resolve your issue.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Chris Evans <chrisccnpspam2 at gmail.com>
> To: Derick Winkworth <dwinkworth at att.net>
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Tue, August 31, 2010 11:45:58 AM
>  Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 10.3 on MX960 with MPC only?
>
>
> Agreed if they offering the mx  as an Ethernet switch this should be
> supported.   Nag your account team.  I had them put in an enhancement
> request
> but who knows if they are listening.
>
> > "Its not supported" is the wrong phrase.  "Its broken" is more
> appropriate.
> >Whatever design choices that were made in the past that led to this, as
> you
> >said, "mind-blowing" caveat, Juniper needs to go backwards and fix it.
> >
> > On Tue Aug 31st, 2010 8:01 AM CDT Chris Evans wrote:
> >
> >>Try configuring an irb, igmp, igmp-snooping and a trunk port on 10.x
> code.
> >>It will tell you its not supported.  It's never been supported per JTAC.
> >>Also as per jtacs comment they put that statement in newer code as they
> >>didn't know it wasnt supported before.  I asked jtac to update the
> >>documentation.
> >> > Is this in documentation somewhere? I just did a quick pass through
> the
> >>IGMP
> >>> snooping docs and I did not see it stated anywhere in there... maybe I
> >>missed
> >>> it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ________________________________
> >>> From: Derick Winkworth <dwinkworth at att.net>
> >>> To: Chris Evans <chrisccnpspam2 at gmail.com>; Gavin Tweedie <
> gav at narx.net>
> >>> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> Sent: Tue, August 31, 2010 7:13:37 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 10.3 on MX960 with MPC only?
> >>>
> >>> ###########
> >>> I'm not even going to mention that
> >>>
> >>> IGMP-Snooping isn't support on trunk interfaces which blows my mind.
> >>> ############
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> wow!
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>