[j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ?

Peter Krupl Peter.Krupl at siminn.dk
Thu Sep 23 07:46:19 EDT 2010


Hi Micael,

I sent a simplified version of my config. The reason we are using "vlan-tagging",
is that we are doing a lot of CCC's on the boxes. So ethernet switching is not an option for us. 

Kind Regards,
Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Damkot > Sent: 23. September, 2010 13:33
> To: Peter Krupl
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Ex4200 no native vlan, without fam. eth-switching. ?
> 
> There's a switch to make it the native VLAN, but I believe you should not be using
> the "vlan-tagging' configuration method with ex series switches per Juniper 'best
> practices'
> 
> I think for best practices, you do it something like this:
> 
> Configure the VLANS:
> 
> set vlans lab-team vlan-id 300
> set vlans lab-team l3-interface vlan.300
> set vlans qa-tester vlan-id 301
> set vlans qa-tester l3-interface vlan.301
> set vlans contractors vlan-id 302
> set vlans contractors l3-interface vlan.302
> set vlans ive-cluster vlan-id 330
> set vlans ive-cluster l3-interface vlan.330
> 
> Configure the L3 Interfaces for the respective VLANS (you have to do this first if
> you commit between each block of config)
> 
> set interfaces vlan unit 300 family inet address xx.xx.60.2/24 vrrp-group 0 virtual-
> address xx.xx.60.1
> set interfaces vlan unit 300 family inet address xx.xx.60.2/24 vrrp-group 0 priority
> 250
> set interfaces vlan unit 300 family inet address xx.xx.60.2/24 vrrp-group 0 accept-
> data
> set interfaces vlan unit 300 family inet6 address DEAD:BEEF:300:1001::1/64
> set interfaces vlan unit 301 family inet address xx.xx.61.2/24 vrrp-group 1 virtual-
> address xx.xx.61.1
> set interfaces vlan unit 301 family inet address xx.xx.61.2/24 vrrp-group 1 priority
> 250
> set interfaces vlan unit 301 family inet address xx.xx.61.2/24 vrrp-group 1 accept-
> data
> set interfaces vlan unit 301 family inet6 address DEAD:BEEF:300:1002::1/64
> set interfaces vlan unit 302 family inet address xx.xx.62.2/23 vrrp-group 2 virtual-
> address xx.xx.62.1
> set interfaces vlan unit 302 family inet address xx.xx.62.2/23 vrrp-group 2 priority
> 250
> set interfaces vlan unit 302 family inet address xx.xx.62.2/23 vrrp-group 2 accept-
> data
> set interfaces vlan unit 302 family inet6 address DEAD:BEEF:300:1003::1/64
> set interfaces vlan unit 330 description "Default Inside Interface for IVE"
> set interfaces vlan unit 330 family inet address xx.xx.59.242/28 vrrp-group 30
> virtual-address xx.xx.59.241
> set interfaces vlan unit 330 family inet address xx.xx.59.242/28 vrrp-group 30
> priority 250
> set interfaces vlan unit 330 family inet address xx.xx.59.242/28 vrrp-group 30
> accept-data
> 
> Then configure the physical ports:
> 
> set interfaces ge-4/0/4 description "To hrn-core-ive-01 inside interface"
> set interfaces ge-4/0/4 unit 0 family ethernet-switching port-mode trunk
> set interfaces ge-4/0/4 unit 0 family ethernet-switching vlan members lab-team
> set interfaces ge-4/0/4 unit 0 family ethernet-switching vlan members qa-tester
> set interfaces ge-4/0/4 unit 0 family ethernet-switching vlan members contractors
> set interfaces ge-4/0/4 unit 0 family ethernet-switching native-vlan-id ive-cluster
> 
> NOTE: the vlan L3 interface correlates to the Unit under 'interfaces vlan' but they
> don't have to match...
> 
> 
> On Sep 23, 2010, at 03:58 , Peter Krupl wrote:
> 
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > Can I realy be true that it is not possible to have both vlan tagged and untagged
> subinterfaces son the same
> > physical interface on the EX4200 without using "fam. eth-switching" ?
> >
> > I have the following configuration:
> >
> > set interfaces ge-0/0/10 vlan-tagging
> > set interfaces ge-0/0/10 unit 10 vlan-id 10
> > set interfaces ge-0/0/10 unit 10 family inet address 192.168.100.1/24
> > set interfaces ge-0/0/10 unit 20 vlan-id 20
> > set interfaces ge-0/0/10 unit 20 family inet address 192.168.101.1/24
> >
> > But what if I also would like to route traffic that is untagged on the same interface
> ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Peter Krüpl
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list