[j-nsp] MX80 - restricted bundles and disabled 10G ports.

[Kevin Oberman]

> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Derick Winkworth <dwinkworth at att.net>
> Sender: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> 
> Argh!  Please tell me this is a joke!  
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: David Ball <davidtball at gmail.com>
> To: Juniper-Nsp <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 9:46:45 AM
> Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 - restricted bundles and disabled 10G ports.
> 
>   A question almost too obvious to ask, but can someone with one of
> the restricted MX80 bundles (which disables 2 of the 10G ports)
> confirm that ports 0/0/0 and 0/0/1 are the ones left enabled?  I don't
> have a restricted one yet, and am trying to finish a standards doc.
> Thanks....just trying to avoid assumptions here.  <g>
> 
> David
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Oh, it most certainly is a joke! A bad one.

But that does not make it less real. Reminds me of 20 or 25 years ago
when Digital came out with a cheap micro-VAX system that was identical
to a much more expensive system with the exception of the epoxy with
which they filled the expansion slots. The cost of a replacement Q-Bus
backplane was far below the difference between the two systems, so guess
what everyone was doing! That joke turned out to be on DEC.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman at es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751