[j-nsp] vrrp issue with ipv6

[Nick Kritsky]

2 masters looks like split-brain to me. If two persons cannot agree on
something - chances are they cannot hear each other. Did you verify the
connectivity?
like running tcpdump on both MX and see if there is a difference?

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am experiencing a weird issue on mx240 running version 10.4R4.5;
>
> I've 2 mxs connected to each other and vrrp is setup and these routers are
> connected to EX4200.
>
> for ipv4 all seems fine.
>
> for v6 i see both router1 and router2 as active master.
>
> r1
> ae0.110       up              0   backup   Active      D  3.020 lcl
>                                                                vip
>                                                                mas
> ae0.110       up              0   master   Active      A
>                                                                vip
>                                                                vip
> r2
> ae0.110       up              0   master   Active      A  0.597 lcl
>                                                                vip
> ae0.110       up              0   master   Active      A  0.088 lcl
>                                                                vip
>                                                                vip
>
>
> in logs of r1 all seems normal
>
> in r2 logs there is a weird
>
> ug  3 00:15:09 vrrp packet sent out on ifl 70 ver 1 group 0
> Aug  3 00:15:09 vrrp packet absorbed on ifl 70 ver 0 group 0
> Aug  3 00:15:09 vrrp packet absorbed on ifl 73 ver 0 group 0
> Aug  3 00:15:09 vrrp packet sent out on ifl 72 ver 1 group 0
> Aug  3 00:15:09 vrrp packet absorbed on ifl 71 ver 0 group 0
> Aug  3 00:15:09 vrrp packet absorbed on ifl 69 ver 0 group 0
> Aug  3 00:15:09 vrrp packet sent out on ifl 73 ver 1 group 0
>
>
> my re filters for v4
>
> term vrrp {
>   from {
>       interface-group 1;
>       destination-address {
>           224.0.0.18/32;
>       }
>   }
>   then accept;
> }
>
> my re filters for v6 is
>
> term allow-vrrp {
>   from {
>       next-header vrrp;
>   }
>   then accept;
>
>
>
> anyone has a clue what I am doing wrong here?
>
> mehmet
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>