[j-nsp] SRX2xx Question.
Tim Jackson
jackson.tim at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 21:38:42 EDT 2011
Anybody tested the throughput on these in packet mode only?
On Jul 26, 2011 8:26 PM, "Bill Blackford" <bblackford at gmail.com> wrote:
> Used 210's and 220 that were running BGP, OSPF and NAT (both static
> and pools) all simultaneously. They do well.
>
> -b
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Keith <kwoody at citywest.ca> wrote:
>> We need to get something in our work lab for testing the odd thing out
>> and just to bang on.
>>
>> Is the SRX line, say the 240 or or 210 enough to run a very simple
>> BGP config (like say sending a few /22's and receiving a default route)
>> and RIP/OSPF?
>>
>> Seems we can pick up an SRX for 600-2000 depending on what SRX
>> it is. At least this is what I see on Ebay.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Blackford
> Network Engineer
>
> Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list