[j-nsp] MX80 Opinions

[OBrien, Will]

I've had 10.4r4 in my lab MX960 for a couple of weeks now with no real issues, but not much test traffic either.
I'm planning to deploy it later this summer to prep for MS-DPC's that are on the way.

I do have an odd case of a nat service breaking a filter based policer, but on for Nat'd traffic. However, I don't know if it's simply due to the implementation or the code yet.

On Jun 4, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:57:43PM -0400, Keegan Holley wrote:
>>> 10.4R4 seems usable on MX960 with mixed DPC/MPC. There is a packet
>>> discard bug on MX80 though - it "randomly" mistakes non-first fragments
>>> as L2TP packets and as no L2TP service is configured, discards those
>>> packets.
>> 
>> Would you happen to have the PR for this?
> 
> PR/611029, fix targetted for 10.4R6, 11.1R3, 11.2R1, 11.3R1
> 
> Best regards,
> Daniel
> 
> -- 
> CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp