[j-nsp] 10G BGP EX vs MX series implementation?

[Chris Evans]

Ex cannot handle large tables.
On Jun 6, 2011 1:16 PM, "Correa Adolfo" <acorrea at mcmtelecom.com.mx> wrote:
> Hi, I want to purchase a 10G device that supports
>
> - 4x 10G port
>
> - 3x full BGP table (ISP) plus about 5 BGP customers
>
> - 10x 1G port
>
>
>
> I was attracted to buy an MX-80 with it's 4x 10G ports unblocked.
>
>
>
> The downside of the MX80 is that it cannot be processor redundant (only
from 240 and up) .
>
>
>
> Can a EX4500 handle the BGP part? It is cheaper and I think it can be
redundant.
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp