[j-nsp] Can per flow load-balancing result in TCP session drops?

[Joel Jaeggli]

On Jun 27, 2011, at 8:07 AM, MSusiva wrote:

> Hi experts,
> 
> Is MX80 a flow based or packet based router?

the trio chipset and by extention all MX routers are packet based devices.

flow cached routing hasn't worked in the internet core for a long time.

> With asymmetric routing, will the TCP session ever get established. Suppose
> if SYN packet goes out through one interface and the SYN+ACK is received on
> another interface, will this router drop this SYN+ACK as this behavior is
> seen in J series routers.
> 
> Thanks,
> Siva
> JNCIS-M
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>