[j-nsp] MTU issue between juniper routers
meryem Z
meryem_z at hotmail.com
Mon Mar 28 06:17:51 EDT 2011
Hi Pekka,
I checked this , but there are no dropped packets by the loopback filter policers :
show firewall filter protect-RE
Filter: protect-RE
Counters:
Name Bytes Packets
bgp-traffic 145288 2993
ftp-traffic 0 0
icmp-traffic 1800603780 62102280
junoscop-traffic 60 1
others 563402042 7809827
snmp-traffic 637288880 6015830
ssh-traffic 928 19
tcp-established 3093764378 15322802
tcp-syn 831652 17062
telnet-traffic 17444 308
traceroute-traffic 98549 2359
vrrp-traffic 0 0
Policers:
Name Packets
RE-HIGH-POLICER-ftp 0
RE-HIGH-POLICER-ssh 0
RE-HIGH-POLICER-vrrp 0
RE-LOW-POLICER-tcp-syn-attack-protection 0
RE-MEDIUM-HIGH-POLICER-ntp 0
RE-MEDIUM-HIGH-POLICER-snmp 1
RE-MEDIUM-LOW-POLICER-telnet 0
RE-MEDIUM-LOW-POLICER-traceroute 0
Thanks.
> Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 08:38:18 +0300
> From: pekkas at netcore.fi
> To: meryem_z at hotmail.com
> CC: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MTU issue between juniper routers
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, meryem Z wrote:
> > - MTU on Ge interface is configured to 4484 on both ends of the links. but ping (from P to PE ) greater than 1600 bytes fails.
> > - I checked interfaces configuration , and also did a "show interfaces" to verify the effective mtu value used. everything is ok.
> > - i'm suspecting some node on the transmission path between the P and the PE configured with the default value of 1500 for GE , but i couldn't find any equivalent command to the linux tracepath on juniper routers.
>
> This is not very probable but:
>
> Check that the packets are not being sent as fragments and dropped
> in receiver's loopback filters.
>
> Even though MTU is high, we've come across unnecessary (IPv6)
> fragmentation when certain conditions are met - PR/571596
>
> --
> Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list