[j-nsp] MX80 throughput

[Joel Jaeggli]

On May 15, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Dermot Williams wrote:

> Hello list,
> 
> I'm speccing out a replacement for our aging M10i platform. We're pulling about 3.5Gbps in from our transit providers and sending about 0.5 out. I expect to see this increase to around 10 inbound in the short-term and possibly go to 20 over the next couple of years.
> 
> I'm looking at the MX80 platform, specifically the model that has 48 electrical GigE ports baked in as opposed to taking MICs. However I've been told that this version doesn't have ASICs and does all of its forwarding in software.

Not sure who told you that. the mx80 has one pfe and no fabric (which it doesn't need because there's only one pfe), the 48t which is a fixed configuration box is no exception.

> Does anyone have any thoughts on the real-world performance of this box? Would it suffice for the traffic levels I'm talking about?

it should be it's a step up from the m10i along virtually every dimension other than the ability to take wan interfaces.


> Thanks,
> 
> Dermot Williams
> Imagine Communications Group Ltd.
> --------------------------
> Sent using BlackBerry
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>