[j-nsp] JUNOS and 128.0.0.0 martian (JFYI)

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 04:59:54 AM Vladimir Blazhkun 
wrote:

> +1. I guess nobody cares about intersecting address
> spaces in typical BGP L3VPNs, why to discuss router's
> internals then?

See my previous post.

That's why even with l3vpn's in our environment, we still 
stick to private address space when addressing PE-CE links.

Routers have broken in strange ways, and things you've 
expected should never happen still do! That's why even 
though numbering PE-CE links with public addresses would be 
ideal, things could escalate if those routes were to leak 
into the global table.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20111011/db561e0a/attachment.pgp>