[j-nsp] TCAM full on EX8200?
Michele Bergonzoni
bergonz at labs.it
Thu Oct 13 08:19:40 EDT 2011
Il 13/10/2011 13.31, Chen Jiang ha scritto:
> AFAIK, The EX8200 use SRAM for FIB and TCAM for ACL, that's not like
> EX2200/3200/4200 that use TCAM for all FIB and ACL.
> You could vty to line card and try this knob and see what happened:
> PFEM2(vty)# show shim route lpm-dmm-stats
Not sure to understand how something can switch data at that speed using
SRAM as a FIB, but it's consistent with my TCAM appearing almost empty.
Anyway, here's the output:
PFEM2(vty)# show shim route lpm-dmm-stats
IPV4
-----
ShadowIdx: 0 Partition: 0
numOfUsedBlocks : 2077 numOfAllocatedBytes : 48216
numOfFreeBytes : 2046640 numOfPickAllocatedBytes : 48380
numOfPickAllBlocks : 2370
ShadowIdx: 0 Partition: 1
numOfUsedBlocks : 320 numOfAllocatedBytes : 667884
numOfFreeBytes : 1427132 numOfPickAllocatedBytes : 672216
numOfPickAllBlocks : 448
ShadowIdx: 0 Partition: 2
numOfUsedBlocks : 17569 numOfAllocatedBytes :
2083064
numOfFreeBytes : 11952 numOfPickAllocatedBytes :
2083816
numOfPickAllBlocks : 22343
IPV6
-----
ShadowIdx: 0 Partition: 0
numOfUsedBlocks : 2077 numOfAllocatedBytes : 48216
numOfFreeBytes : 2046640 numOfPickAllocatedBytes : 48380
numOfPickAllBlocks : 2370
ShadowIdx: 0 Partition: 1
numOfUsedBlocks : 320 numOfAllocatedBytes : 667884
numOfFreeBytes : 1427132 numOfPickAllocatedBytes : 672216
numOfPickAllBlocks : 448
ShadowIdx: 0 Partition: 2
numOfUsedBlocks : 17569 numOfAllocatedBytes :
2083064
numOfFreeBytes : 11952 numOfPickAllocatedBytes :
2083816
numOfPickAllBlocks : 22343
Thanks for the interest and the suggestion,
Bergonz
--
Ing. Michele Bergonzoni - Laboratori Guglielmo Marconi S.p.a.
Phone:+39-051-4392826 e-mail: bergonz at labs.it
alt.advanced.networks.design.configure.operate
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list