[j-nsp] TCAM full on EX8200?

[Mark Tinka]

On Sunday, October 16, 2011 09:56:41 AM Julien Goodwin 
wrote:

> I do object to the "still vaporware", "not due to ship
> until the end of the year" is closer. The main threat to
> the T-series is that 10ge slowly removing the need for
> Sonet/SDH,...

But on the flip side, a lot of folk are still keeping the T-
series in their networks because non-Ethernet ports are 
cheaper to do on these units.

On the other hand, Cisco's CRS has lots of dense, line rate 
10Gbps capability on a tight budget, by comparison, and can 
do non-Ethernet ports reasonably well too, when pitched 
against the Ethernet-optimized boxes that ship with a 
"patch" for non-Ethernet ports like Cisco's ASR9000 or 
Juniper's MX line.

> and if all you need is 10g LAN-PHY the MX
> with the 16-port MIC does it nicely.

There should be a newer version of this line card coming 
with WAN-PHY support.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20111016/cabb43e6/attachment.pgp>