[j-nsp] Ethernet OAM question?

Mark Tinka mtinka at globaltransit.net
Thu Oct 20 02:37:46 EDT 2011


On Wednesday, October 19, 2011 01:30:09 PM David Ball wrote:

>   I wouldn't trust the intermediary providers to
> transport 802.3ad/LACP PDUs transparently, unless they
> all have indicated that it's supported via L2 protocol
> tunneling (though I'd still be a skeptic, if there are
> multiple carriers).

Unless you're getting port-mode EoMPLS from the carrier, in 
which case it should be fine.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20111020/5fa4d735/attachment.pgp>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list