[j-nsp] TCAM full on EX8200?

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, October 19, 2011 03:14:01 PM Pavel Lunin 
wrote:

> Another example is LB. To make it smooth, LSR must get
> quite deep bits from MPLS payload and process NH table
> accordingly.

I think decent core routers do this today. We've had good 
luck load sharing MPLS traffic on LDP labels alone on 
various Cisco and Juniper kit, provided the IGP cost is the 
same.

Of course, when that fails, MPLS-TE is your friend.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20111020/96853e10/attachment.pgp>