[j-nsp] TCAM full on EX8200?

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, October 20, 2011 04:25:02 PM Pavel Lunin wrote:

> This is where the number of labels comes into play. If we
> talk about LSR for not that huge IPS (having not that
> much of core LSPs), I'm afraid, this can require to get
> back to the old good conception of FEC per prefix :)

When we were small and using Cisco 7200's as BGP-free core 
routers, we were load balancing just fine. And this was a 
network doing less than 500Mbps of aggregated traffic.

Of course, things are far more different nowadays :-).

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20111020/a3764b58/attachment.pgp>