[j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826

[Paul Stewart]

Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about this
kind of stuff ;)

We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality - some
are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues with - definitely it's
not perfect).  We've been bitten by some surprises as well ... so I'm not
disagreeing, just saying that we're pretty used to these issues we've
encountered and don't deploy if we know they will come up. Typically, we use
them as site to site VPN boxes along with firewalling.

I have an SRX210 at my home as well - run the full UTM suite on it and had
no real issues (granted it's a home environment to be fair).

RAS, can you share a few highlights of "broken"?

Appreciate it,
Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: September-01-11 11:35 AM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826

On 01/09/11 10:09, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

> I have an SRX210 in my basement doing my home routing, and it is the
> only free device I've ever been given that I would seriously consider
> returning and asking for my money back. Broken doesn't even begin to
> describe it, my condolences to anyone who actually needs to run these
> things in production.

Is this for routing functionality, or firewall functionality?

We're using one as an MPLS PE, and it seems to be working ok, but given 
what you've said... gulp!

Is there a good summary of the problems anywhere, or do I need to trawl 
the archives?
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp