[j-nsp] SRX Experiences - Was: JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826

[Nathan Sipes]

10.4R2 and 11.1R2 The local interzone traffic continued to forward and
traffic sourced from the outside interface continued to work.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:

> We have yet to see that even with PIM modules installed – do you remember
> what version of JunOS you were running by chance?****
>
> ** **
>
> Paul****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Nathan Sipes [mailto:nathan.sipes at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* September-01-11 12:05 PM
> *To:* Paul Stewart
> *Cc:* juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826****
>
> ** **
>
> I have had similar experiences to Richard's with the "Free SRX210H" I even
> managed to get a DSL PIM in there as well. Had it up and working for about 2
> months when the pim quit forwarding traffic randomly. Rebooting the SRX
> seems to fix it well enough though... I will say that the free hardware has
> cost a lot of my time and some annoyed phone calls from my wife when netflix
> doesn't work. ****
>
>
>
>  ****
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:
> ****
>
> Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about this
> kind of stuff ;)
>
> We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality - some
> are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues with - definitely it's
> not perfect).  We've been bitten by some surprises as well ... so I'm not
> disagreeing, just saying that we're pretty used to these issues we've
> encountered and don't deploy if we know they will come up. Typically, we
> use
> them as site to site VPN boxes along with firewalling.
>
> I have an SRX210 at my home as well - run the full UTM suite on it and had
> no real issues (granted it's a home environment to be fair).
>
> RAS, can you share a few highlights of "broken"?
>
> Appreciate it,
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
> Sent: September-01-11 11:35 AM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826****
>
>
> On 01/09/11 10:09, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> > I have an SRX210 in my basement doing my home routing, and it is the
> > only free device I've ever been given that I would seriously consider
> > returning and asking for my money back. Broken doesn't even begin to
> > describe it, my condolences to anyone who actually needs to run these
> > things in production.
>
> Is this for routing functionality, or firewall functionality?
>
> We're using one as an MPLS PE, and it seems to be working ok, but given
> what you've said... gulp!
>
> Is there a good summary of the problems anywhere, or do I need to trawl
> the archives?
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp****
>
> ** **
>