[j-nsp] SRX Experiences - Was: JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826

[Nathan Sipes]

That may be the difference I am running the SRX-MP-1VDSL2-A PIM.



On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Jerry Jones <jjones at danrj.com> wrote:

> Mine here at home has been working well, with the internal ADSL2.
>
> Only initial issue I had were the dumb MTU and MSS defaults.
>
> Only time it gets rebooted is when I pull the wrong cord....
>
> Now I need to fix DDNS. Had it working on 10.1, but 10.4 and 11.x break it
> again.
>
>
>
> On Sep 1, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Nathan Sipes wrote:
>
> 10.4R2 and 11.1R2 The local interzone traffic continued to forward and
> traffic sourced from the outside interface continued to work.
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org>
> wrote:
>
> > We have yet to see that even with PIM modules installed – do you remember
> > what version of JunOS you were running by chance?****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > Paul****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > *From:* Nathan Sipes [mailto:nathan.sipes at gmail.com]
> > *Sent:* September-01-11 12:05 PM
> > *To:* Paul Stewart
> > *Cc:* juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > *Subject:* Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> > I have had similar experiences to Richard's with the "Free SRX210H" I
> even
> > managed to get a DSL PIM in there as well. Had it up and working for
> about 2
> > months when the pim quit forwarding traffic randomly. Rebooting the SRX
> > seems to fix it well enough though... I will say that the free hardware
> has
> > cost a lot of my time and some annoyed phone calls from my wife when
> netflix
> > doesn't work. ****
> >
> >
> >
> > ****
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org>
> wrote:
> > ****
> >
> > Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about
> this
> > kind of stuff ;)
> >
> > We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality -
> some
> > are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues with - definitely
> it's
> > not perfect).  We've been bitten by some surprises as well ... so I'm not
> > disagreeing, just saying that we're pretty used to these issues we've
> > encountered and don't deploy if we know they will come up. Typically, we
> > use
> > them as site to site VPN boxes along with firewalling.
> >
> > I have an SRX210 at my home as well - run the full UTM suite on it and
> had
> > no real issues (granted it's a home environment to be fair).
> >
> > RAS, can you share a few highlights of "broken"?
> >
> > Appreciate it,
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
> > Sent: September-01-11 11:35 AM
> > To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826****
> >
> >
> > On 01/09/11 10:09, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> >
> >> I have an SRX210 in my basement doing my home routing, and it is the
> >> only free device I've ever been given that I would seriously consider
> >> returning and asking for my money back. Broken doesn't even begin to
> >> describe it, my condolences to anyone who actually needs to run these
> >> things in production.
> >
> > Is this for routing functionality, or firewall functionality?
> >
> > We're using one as an MPLS PE, and it seems to be working ok, but given
> > what you've said... gulp!
> >
> > Is there a good summary of the problems anywhere, or do I need to trawl
> > the archives?
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp****
> >
> > ** **
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>