[j-nsp] LSP Refresh ISIS
Vladimir Blazhkun
v.blazhkun at gmail.com
Tue Sep 6 10:29:41 EDT 2011
Hi, David,
I guess it is 317 because the number is a prime one (decreases a
possibility of the self-synchronization). Also 317 looks cool :)
P.S. As was told, 300 is "a reasonable value", the standard says, not
a recommended one, to be precise.
With best regards,
Vladimir Blazhkun.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:41, <david.roy at orange-ftgroup.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just for my understanding.
> Does anybody know why juniper uses LSP Lifetime-317 secs for its max-LSP-origination-interval ? The ISO recommends LSP Lifetime - 300. Why 317 secs ?
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list