[j-nsp] About Juniper MX10 router performance

Morgan McLean wrx230 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 14:30:50 EDT 2012


>From an MX80

inet.0: 400906 destinations, 799589 routes (400906 active, 0 holddown, 0
hidden)
              Direct:      7 routes,      7 active
               Local:      6 routes,      6 active
                OSPF:    105 routes,    104 active
                 BGP: 799470 routes, 400788 active
              Static:      1 routes,      1 active

root at border-a> show chassis routing-engine
Routing Engine status:
    Temperature                 52 degrees C / 125 degrees F
    CPU temperature             64 degrees C / 147 degrees F
    DRAM                      2048 MB
    Memory utilization          42 percent
    CPU utilization:
      User                       0 percent
      Background                 0 percent
      Kernel                     6 percent
      Interrupt                  0 percent
      Idle                      93 percent
    Model                          RE-MX80
    Start time                     2011-12-04 05:07:56 UTC
    Uptime                         141 days, 13 hours, 34 minutes, 41
seconds
    Last reboot reason             Router rebooted after a normal shutdown.
    Load averages:                 1 minute   5 minute  15 minute
                                       0.21       0.14       0.08

root at border-a> show chassis tfeb
TFEB status:
Slot 0 information:
  State                                 Online
  Intake temperature                 51 degrees C / 123 degrees F
  Exhaust temperature                67 degrees C / 152 degrees F
  CPU utilization                     5 percent
  Interrupt utilization               0 percent
  Heap utilization                   29 percent
  Buffer utilization                 13 percent
  Total CPU DRAM                   1024 MB
  Start time:                           2011-12-04 05:10:36 UTC
  Uptime:                               141 days, 13 hours, 32 minutes, 17
seconds


On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Doug Hanks <dhanks at juniper.net> wrote:

> The MX5 scaling is identical to the MX80.  The only difference is that the
> MX5 restricts the physical port usage to MIC0.
>
> 3,000,000 IPv4 prefixes in the RIB.
> 1,000,000 IPv4 unicast in the FIB.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213,  JNCIE-SP #875
> Sr. Systems Engineer
> Juniper Networks
>
>
> On 4/23/12 2:44 AM, "Saku Ytti" <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
>
> >On (2012-04-22 23:52 -0700), Md. Jahangir Hossain wrote:
> >
> >> In some of forum i found 1.6million but in juniper site i can not found
> >>this information.
> >
> >This is certainly possible and will scale further, depending of course
> >what
> >other things are populated in RLDRAM. Giving exact answer might prove
> >difficult.
> >More than likely you'll find control-plane scaling to be insufficient
> >before you'll be bothered by RDLRAM being filled.
> >
> >--
> >  ++ytti
> >_______________________________________________
> >juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list