[j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006

[Serge Vautour]

Note that the MX requires an MS-DPC card in order to to NetFlow v9.

Serge


________________________________
 From: Doug Hanks <dhanks at juniper.net>
To: Peter <piotr.1234 at interia.pl>; "juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net" <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:41:24 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006
 
The last time I looked the ASR9K still had a small FIB and tapped out at
around 500K.

Thank you,

-- 
Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213,  JNCIE-SP #875
Sr. Systems Engineer
Juniper Networks


On 4/24/12 8:55 AM, "Peter" <piotr.1234 at interia.pl> wrote:

>Hi
>
>I have to upgrade my bgp routers, i have budget for two options:
>
>1.
>- bundle: MX240BASE-AC-HIGH, MPC1-3D-R-B, MIC-3D-20XGE-SFP,
>MIC-3D-2XGE-XFP; configurable RE, SCB, and PEM
>- better routing engine RE-S-1800X2-8G-UPG-BB + jflow license ( netflow
>v9 or ipfix) S-ACCT-JFLOW-IN
>
>or
>
>2. asr 9006
>- A9K-RSP-4G
>- A9K-MOD80-TR, 80G Modular Linecard, Packet Transport Optimized
>- license for l3 vpn
>
>the price is almost the same. I need:
>
>- ports: from  4x10G line to  max 8x10G, line rate
>- 3 virtual routers with full ip routing table v4
>- 10 virtual routers with ca 10k prefix in routing table v4
>- v6
>- up to 12 full bgp feed
>- netflow v9 or ipfix, sampling max 100/s
>- define counters on logical and physical interfaces, count many times
>to the same counter, one packet could be count to different counters in
>next term
>- access to counters via snmp
>- independent control plane and data plane
>- and few others things on bgp edge
>
>which model will be better ?
>thanks for some advice
>
>regards
>Peter
>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp