[j-nsp] EX3200 vs. EX4200 MPLS

[chip]

Ok, now that I've said that, I realize that's for the 4500, not sure
on the 4200's.  Also, its not clear on whether that number scales if
you start clustering things.

--chip

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:08 AM, chip <chip.gwyn at gmail.com> wrote:
> I seem to recall a 4200 could do around 120ish CCC's, with some
> updated (hardware?) software that number should almost double.
>
> --chip
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Chris Kawchuk <juniperdude at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have yet to run into any limit. There probably is one, but would need to Lab it up and try to max it out.
>>
>> I've heard of people using EX3200/4200s as a pure MPLS CCC endpoint device (i.e. 1 LSP per physical port) as some kind of wacky olde-style "M13 Mux" like we used to do in the TDM days; so at least as many CCC's as there are physical ports on the box would be a minimum at my guess. You can do CCC per-VLAN as well, so your can get many more LSPs than just the # of physical IFDs.
>>
>> - CK.
>>
>> On 2012-04-30, at 1:33 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>>
>>> Chris/Ben,
>>>
>>> How would I go about finding how how many CCC the EX3200/4200 can support?
>>>
>>> ...Skeeve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
> --
> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....



-- 
Just my $.02, your mileage may vary,  batteries not included, etc....