[j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 series..and 1RU LSR?

[Georgios Vlachos]

Only l2circuit for now, rumors are that vpls is in the roadmap.

With vpls it could get really interesting...


-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Caillin Bathern
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 2:39 PM
To: Ben Dale; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 series..and 1RU LSR?

No multicast today either... just a head ups :(
L3VPNs also missing until the end of the month..

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ben Dale
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 11:25 PM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net List
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] LDP on ex4200/3200 series....and 1RU LSR?



On 20/12/2012, at 4:58 PM, Michel de Nostredame <d.nostra at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Possibly Juniper is positioning ACX for that?
> But ACX has far lower port density and those 1U ACX has only DC 
> power-supplier.

This was my feeling too, but there is *currently* no VPLS support on
ACX.  I'm hoping that will change in the future.

The passive cooling is a big win and although the data sheet doesn't
mention it, there is an AC version of the ACX 1100 on the pricelist: 

ACX1100 Universal Access Router, AC Version, Dual power supply, 1RU,
ETSI 300, SyncE/1588v2, Temperature hardened, Passively cooled,8xGE
RJ45, 4xGE RJ45/SFP Combo (Optics Sold Separately)

I've got a pair of these coming into the lab in the new year (lead times
are currently measured in *months*) and will be interested to see what
the limitations are.  They're priced right in the middle of the J4350
and J6350 too which is also interesting.

> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mark Tees <marktees at gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Can't help but wonder what they were thinking with that design.
>> 
>> How many people out there want this functionality in a 1RU box?
>> 
>> On 20/12/2012, at 1:00 PM, Tim Jackson wrote:
>> 
>>> It can't even pass packets with > 1 label.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Tim
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Mark Tees <marktees at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> Would it be feasible still for only outer label operations?
>>> 
>>> To use as P router would you only ever need to work with outer
label?
>>> 
>>> Sent from some sort of iDevice.
>>> 
>>> On 20/12/2012, at 9:52 AM, Craig Askings
<caskings at ionetworks.com.au> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 19 December 2012 20:18, Mark Tees <marktees at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Has anyone heard about if there is ever going to be support for 
>>>>> LDP on the
>>>>> ex4200/3200 series?
>>>> 
>>>> From what I understand the chipset on ex4200/3200 does not support 
>>>> more than one mpls label, so LDP etc is not possible on that
hardware.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Craig Askings
>>>> 
>>>> io Networks Pty Ltd.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> mobile: 0404 019365
>>>> 
>>>> phone: 1300 1 2 4 8 16
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Message  protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and
content filtering.http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp