[j-nsp] IPv6 VRRP issue on SRX100
Try Chhay
try at eintellego.asia
Mon Dec 31 04:07:22 EST 2012
Hi,
Please see the config as the follows:
SRX100-A# show interfaces vlan unit 90 family inet6
address fe80::2/64;
address 2001::2/64 {
vrrp-inet6-group 2 {
virtual-inet6-address 2001::1;
virtual-link-local-address fe80::1;
priority 110;
inet6-advertise-interval 100;
preempt;
accept-data;
}
}
SRX100-B# show interfaces vlan unit 90 family inet6
address fe80::3/64;
address 2001::3/64 {
vrrp-inet6-group 2 {
virtual-inet6-address 2001::1;
virtual-link-local-address fe80::1;
priority 100;
inet6-advertise-interval 100;
preempt;
accept-data;
}
}
On each SRX100
# show protocols
router-advertisement {
interface vlan.90 {
max-advertisement-interval 4;
virtual-router-only;
prefix 2001:44b8:31b1:7700::/56;
prefix 2001::/64;
}
# show security forwarding-options
family {
inet6 {
mode packet-based;
}
}
SRX100-A# run show vrrp
Interface State Group VR state VR Mode Timer Type Address
vlan.90 up 1 master Active A 0.843 lcl
192.168.147.2
vip
192.168.147.1
vlan.90 up 2 master Active A 0.038 lcl
2001::2
vip
fe80::1
vip
2001::1
SRX100-B# run show vrrp
Interface State Group VR state VR Mode Timer Type Address
vlan.90 up 1 backup Active D 3.135 lcl
192.168.147.3
vip
192.168.147.1
mas
192.168.147.2
vlan.90 up 2 backup Active D 0.283 lcl
2001::3
vip
fe80::1
vip
2001::1
mas
fe80::2
In the result client is unable to ping virtual IPv6 address. Any idea?
*
*
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:50 PM, <sthaug at nethelp.no> wrote:
> > After changing to *packet base *for IPv6, the IPv6 VRRP seems to be
> working
> > as expected. The higher priority is master and lower priority is backup.
> > However, client still can not ping virtual IPv6 address while it can ping
> > to each IPv6 on both SRX100.
>
> Do you have "accept-data" under family inet6 address ... vrrp-inet6-group ?
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list