[j-nsp] next hop behavior within between VRFs

Ido Szargel ido at oasis-tech.net
Sun Feb 5 05:16:37 EST 2012


Yes, connectivity across the lt (pings from one side to the other) is
working,

Ido

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of OBrien, Will
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 3:11 AM
To: Amos Rosenboim
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] next hop behavior within between VRFs

Have you verified connectivity across the lt?

Will O'Brien

On Feb 4, 2012, at 2:21 PM, "Amos Rosenboim" <amos at oasis-tech.net> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> I have a router with two VRFs.
> I need to apply FBF on traffic flowing between the two VRFs so I created a
logical tunnel that connects the two VRFs.
> The problem is that when importing routes from one VRF to the other the
next hop is obviously not through the tunnel.
> I am trying to apply an import map that will change the next-hop of
imported routes to the tunnel interface, but it doesn't work (traffic still
bypasses the tunnel).
> 
> I can obviously skip the VRF import method and simply run BGP over the
tunnels but I would like to avoid this as it forces me to use route
refection (the routes I need to announce are learnt via iBGP) and so on.
> Any ideas how to achieve the goal of sharing routes between the VRFs but
controlling the next hop in each VRF differently ?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Amos
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list