[j-nsp] Internet routes in MPLS network, global table or own VRF?
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Thu Jan 26 06:52:57 EST 2012
On Sunday, January 22, 2012 08:55:07 AM Derick Winkworth
wrote:
> http://packetpushers.net/internet-as-a-service-in-an-mpls
> -cloud/
We keep Internet routes in the global table on all routers
we operate. Different routers have different capabilities
when it comes to how many routes they can hold in a VRF, or
how many VRF's they can have with a fixed number of routes
in them.
We also want to avoid putting too much reliance on MPLS for
basic services like Internet access. We relegate MPLS-based
services to those that MUST have it to work, e.g., BGP-
MVPN's, l2vpn's, l3vpn's, VPLS, e.t.c. Anything else that
doesn't really need MPLS lives on its own, e.g., IPv6 (no
need for 6PE), Internet access, e.t.c.
Keeping it really stupid is what we're after :-).
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20120126/ff2f08c1/attachment.sig>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list