[j-nsp] Internet routes in MPLS network, global table or own VRF?

Mark Tinka mtinka at globaltransit.net
Thu Jan 26 06:52:57 EST 2012


On Sunday, January 22, 2012 08:55:07 AM Derick Winkworth 
wrote:

> http://packetpushers.net/internet-as-a-service-in-an-mpls
> -cloud/ 

We keep Internet routes in the global table on all routers 
we operate. Different routers have different capabilities 
when it comes to how many routes they can hold in a VRF, or 
how many VRF's they can have with a fixed number of routes 
in them.

We also want to avoid putting too much reliance on MPLS for 
basic services like Internet access. We relegate MPLS-based 
services to those that MUST have it to work, e.g., BGP-
MVPN's, l2vpn's, l3vpn's, VPLS, e.t.c. Anything else that 
doesn't really need MPLS lives on its own, e.g., IPv6 (no 
need for 6PE), Internet access, e.t.c.

Keeping it really stupid is what we're after :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20120126/ff2f08c1/attachment.sig>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list