[j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:12:02 PM Paul Stewart wrote:

> One incredible frustration we're going through lately on
> the MX boxes is the BRAS function as Mark mentioned
> briefly ..... we're up to "bleeding edge" code now
> (11.4R1.14) just to get what we consider typical
> features of a BRAS box.  Combine that with the first
> BRAS box I've seen that is picky about Radius VSA's and
> it makes it really difficult to deploy.  We are not sure
> if the word "stable" enters the equation yet as a BRAS
> neither - time will tell as we're pushing out several of
> these boxes shortly despite concerns around code.

Ditto.

The MX is nowhere near ready to run as BRAS. But like you, 
we decided to migrate to it, so we have no choice but to run 
bleeding edge Junos 11.4R1 as well, just to get basic things 
the outgoing Redback is able to do, as well as some IPv6.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20120131/a0d99bca/attachment.sig>