[j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX - Update!

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:52:19 PM Paul Stewart wrote:

> Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying
> E/ERX ;)

While we don't use those, I certainly agree that they sound 
like a much better option from Juniper than the MX.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20120131/1520614c/attachment.sig>