[j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

[OBrien, Will]

Yes. I've got several deployed in those roles.

Will O'Brien

On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:28 PM, "TCIS List Acct" <listacct at tulsaconnect.com> wrote:

> Over the past few years the general feeling I've gotten reading j-nsp and elsewhere was to stay away from the SRX line until the code matured.  We've got an upcoming project that I'm considering using a SRX 240 for.
> 
> Has the code matured to the point that it can be considered a stable platform for security (just basic firewall, 1:1 NATs, maybe a few VPNs), high availability, and some very basic layer 3 routing services?
> 
> TIA.
> 
> --Mike
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp