[j-nsp] Juniper BRAS

[Paul Stewart]

I'm not up to speed on the MLPPP stuff but would look at MX240/MX480/MX960
platform for sure.  The MX80 can only handle about 4k sessions and has no
support for LNS yet I don't believe (coming though if I'm not mistaken).

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: Liam Murphy [mailto:Liam.Murphy at easynet.com] 
Sent: March-26-12 6:30 AM
To: Paul Stewart; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS

About 4000 sessions.
I am just not sure if I can have MLPPPoLT2P

(i.e. up to 8 ppp sessions bundled inside a MLPPP session that terminates on
a Juniper that is acting as an LNS, with subscriber QoS).

Thanks! 


-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: 23 March 2012 20:40
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS

What kind of capacity?  M/MX is only option outside of E/ERX series...



-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Liam Murphy
Sent: March-23-12 1:22 PM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS

Which Juniper router (not E-Series) is best suited for a BRAS.
(L2TP LNS with MLPPP)

Regards

Liam 

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp